MESS vs. SAME some philosophy

Messages from the Commander about life, the universe and everything.
Post Reply
User avatar
Space Commander
Space Commander
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 16, 01:49 am
Location: On the Starport

#1 MESS vs. SAME some philosophy

Post by Commander » Wed, 29 Aug 18, 05:37 am

I ran into a little bit of Flak yesterday on YORF from Royatl. Nothing major, although he quoted me, I think he was actually responding to what GH said. I posted his and my response in the S.A.M.E. forum here on the Cantina.

As I read it, his main response is that making the numbers available for any engine or motor problems would be unfair to the larger producers since statistically with more output and sales they are likely to have more failures. That may to the casual observer appear to mean the larger producers have more problems. Of course being scientifically minded most of the time, we typical rocketeers wouldn't be interested in raw numbers. More likely we would be interested in a failure rate or ratio. Their is a problem, of course, in just stating a number. How accurate is that number and what data was used to create it?

Let's just say that the current to date run for the B20-8 is 2000 released for sale. Additionally we find that each batch is of 500 engines and that they produce two batches per month. Let's also say there have been 4 MESS reports and of those four, two came from the same batch number janB, one came from the JanA, and one came from Feb A.
So how do we report our findings?
Using just the raw numbers we get:
Overall ratio 1 in 500
Jan only statistics 1 in 333
Feb only statistics 1 in 1000
Batch Jan A statistics 1 in 500
Batch Jan B statistics 1 in 250
Batch Feb A statistics 1 in 500
Batch Feb B statistics 0 in 500

Looking at those numbers alone, we might think, "boy I might not want to use a Jan engine especially batch B from that month. The thing is, we are not looking at a complete picture here. As most of us are aware, the entire run of production is not used to launch. The major contributing factor to a reliability statistic is not being collected, and that is an accurate number of successful launches. Without that number, our results are skewed toward a more negative result. Imagine if you will that we get the information required on successful launches of the B20-8 and find out that 100 of the Jan A batch were launched, 400 of the Jan B were launched 350 of the Feb A were launched and 50 of the Feb B were launched. Our numbers would change significantly:
Overall ratio 1 in 175
Jan only statistics 1 in 167
Feb only statistics 1 in 200
Batch Jan A statistics 1 in 100
Batch Jan B statistics 1 in 200
Batch Feb A statistics 1 in 150
Batch Feb B statistics 0 in 50

Now what looked like the batch to stay away from, is possibly the safest with one batch not having enough data to make a statistical factor.

Since they can't get all the data, this is what the MESS people are concerned about. A certain product getting a bad rap because of uncertain statistical information. I can understand that and that is why the Cantina only provides anecdotal information. Anecdotal is going to be out there anyway and sometimes posters actually contradict the general perception.
Starport Sagitta
NAR No.97971

User avatar
Rocket Babe
Space Babe
Space Babe
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 16, 23:34 pm
Location: Alabama

#2 Re: MESS vs. SAME some philosophy

Post by Rocket Babe » Wed, 29 Aug 18, 18:00 pm

I understand what you're saying but for me it's much more simple. All I want to know is which engines cato the most. :(

I have no fear of cato's except for the old OP C-5's or E engines. :evil: I wouldn't use a C5 or an E in anything I value because from my own experience of seeing other flyers loose great rockets to C5 & E catos, I would NEVER use either one! :claw: :claw: :claw: :claw: :claw:

User avatar
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 965
Joined: Tue, 29 Mar 16, 03:55 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

#3 Re: MESS vs. SAME some philosophy

Post by bernomatic » Wed, 29 Aug 18, 18:17 pm

It's problematic. :x
If you want to get really simple with the figures (which in your case Rocket, never could be considered a simple figure. Those compound curves would drive any engineer crazy :P ) the easiest statistic is this. One hundred percent of all CATOs occur with an engine that has been launched. If you don't want a CATO, don't launch. :ugeek:
Chief Cook -n- bottle washer

Post Reply