So, I was reflecting on this conversation when I recalled a thread on another forum dealing with California Proposition 65. Now according to Wikipedia (a sound source I am sure )
California Proposition 65The first statutory requirement of Proposition 65 prohibits businesses from knowingly discharging listed substances into drinking water sources, or onto land where the substances can pass into drinking water sources. The second prohibits businesses from knowingly exposing individuals to listed substances without providing a clear and reasonable warning.
Well I was thinking on it a bit, and I came to realize that with a good lawyer, one could sue any business that one visited in California.
You see, if they don't have a notice at their exit admonishing you that leaving the establishment will expose you to a substance that is known to the State of California to cause cancer (sunlight), they are in violation of the second statutory requirement. The reason it will take a good lawyer is for him to show that the State of California knows this substance to cause cancer in the prescribed amounts, but has been negligent in adding it to the official list. Thus they may be able to include the state as a defendant also.