If Jill Stein is concerned about the outcome of the Election...

What we have all come to expect and love/detest from our employees that ignore us
Post Reply
User avatar
bernomatic
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1195
Joined: Tue, 29 Mar 16, 03:55 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

#1 If Jill Stein is concerned about the outcome of the Election...

Post by bernomatic »

Why is she asking for recounts only in states were President-Elect Trump won by small margins :?:

There are three states (New Hampshire, Nevada, and New Hampshire) were Hillary won by a smaller margin than Donald won in Pennsylvania. Yet Jill Stein has yet to comment about these states.

Jill Stein states that there have been noted voting irregularities in the three states she is requesting a recount in as noted by "computer scientists". These "scientists" state the states may voting system may have been hacked. Yet, in one instance, Michigan, the voting process exclusively uses paper and optical scanners without any connection to the internet. Meaning that "hacking the count" would be very improbable. Michigan, being as tight a count as it was has already done their own recount to be able to certify their results. If there is a large anomaly in the totals, after another recount, this could get quite messy. :?
Chief Cook -n- bottle washer
tmacklin
Space Ensign
Space Ensign
Posts: 287
Joined: Sat, 09 Apr 16, 11:56 am

#2 Re: If Jill Stein is concerned about the outcome of the Election...

Post by tmacklin »

bernomatic wrote:Why is she asking for recounts only in states were President-Elect Trump won by small margins :?:

There are three states (New Hampshire, Nevada, and New Hampshire) were Hillary won by a smaller margin than Donald won in Pennsylvania. Yet Jill Stein has yet to comment about these states.

Jill Stein states that there have been noted voting irregularities in the three states she is requesting a recount in as noted by "computer scientists". These "scientists" state the states may voting system may have been hacked. Yet, in one instance, Michigan, the voting process exclusively uses paper and optical scanners without any connection to the internet. Meaning that "hacking the count" would be very improbable. Michigan, being as tight a count as it was has already done their own recount to be able to certify their results. If there is a large anomaly in the totals, after another recount, this could get quite messy. :?
The Trump camp has been somewhat subdued about this recount nonsense. They should be making sure they have "watchers" during any and all recounts, especially in Wisconsin which is a sewer in Democrat cheating schemes. It could very well turn out that a genuine recount effort will actually uncover Democrat cheating anywhere they control the election process. Just remember the bullcrap they pulled in Wisconsin against Scott Walker.

"Smithers, release the Hounds."
Post Reply