New York City's City Council Public Safety Committee voted 6-1 in favor of giving warnings akin to the ones on a side of a pack of cigarettes to citizens applying for a gun permit in the city. article
This in an effort to allay the "The pain that comes with these incidents (the Los Vegas shooting) has become far too common, yet our federal law makers refuse to take action. We in the City will take action by passing legislation aimed at keeping our fellow New Yorkers safe from gun violence." -Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito (D)
It is ironic that another mass murder has occurred, this time in New York City. The weapon of choice for the terrorist? A truck. With the number of deaths and injuries caused by vehicles I wonder if the good councilwoman will now seek to have warnings printed on the sides of vehicles. In Boston a few years back, it was a pressure cooker. When will these progressive liberals with their supposed greater intelligence, finally realize what most of the rest of us have come to understand. It is not the weapon, but the bad people we must try to restrain. Taking away one weapon only means the evil-doer will look for something else.
NYC giving health warnings for gun ownership.
- bernomatic
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Tue, 29 Mar 16, 03:55 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- Contact:
#1 NYC giving health warnings for gun ownership.
Chief Cook -n- bottle washer
- luke strawwalker
- Space Admiral
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu, 07 Apr 16, 04:45 am
#2 Re: NYC giving health warnings for gun ownership.
When trucks are outlawed, only outlaws will have trucks...
Later! OL J R
Later! OL J R
My MUNIFICENCE is BOUNDLESS, Mr. Bond...
#3 Re: NYC giving health warnings for gun ownership.
How about a ban on anyone from Douchebagistan entering the United States?
- bernomatic
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Tue, 29 Mar 16, 03:55 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- Contact:
#4 Re: NYC giving health warnings for gun ownership.
They (the White House) keep trying, but the progressive liberals keep filing court cases in progressive courts, which are ultimately overturned by the Supreme Court. Of course by the time the Supreme Court gets it, we've already "welcomed" another load of "refugees" of which a few may be radicals. Of Course, then the progressive liberals file another suit and the whole thing starts again.tmacklin wrote:How about a ban on anyone from Douchebagistan entering the United States?
I think we should house the "refugees" in the politician's or judge's neighborhood.
Chief Cook -n- bottle washer